Memo To: Zbigniew Brzezinski
From: Jude Wanniski
Re: The Committee on the Present Danger
You have been recently active in promoting a diplomatic engagement of Iran, hoping to short-circuit a crisis that might lead to a military conflict from that quarter. Bless you Zbig for your initiatives and those of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). No sooner than you and CSIS have stepped forward with constructive approaches to our relations with Tehran, the neo-con warriors have reconstituted themselves with a commitment to use whatever FORCE is necessary to bludgeon Tehran into whatever neo-cons ask of them. The call themselves the "Committee on the Present Danger," a barely disguised front group for the Israeli Likudniks, old Cold War warriors who are now mapping plans to win American public support for an Israeli bombing of nuclear power plants in Iran. There are several commentaries on this circulating on the Internet, but this one by Jim Lobe is the best of the lot in summing up what's going on. You are in a central role, Zbig, because you were at one time aligned with these old Cold Warriors, as I was. As far as I am concerned, the Committee on the Present Danger is the most important "present danger" on the planet. Be careful, Zbig.
July 21, 2004
Neocons Revive Cold War Group
by Jim Lobe
A bipartisan group of 41 mainly neoconservative foreign-policy hawks has launched the third Committee on the Present Danger (CPD) whose previous two incarnations mobilized public support for rolling back Soviet-led communism but whose new enemy will be "global terrorism."
The new group, announced at a Capitol Hill press conference Tuesday, said its "single mission" will be to "advocate policies intended to win the war on global terrorism � terrorism carried out by radical Islamists opposed to freedom and democracy."
"The committee intends to remain active until the present danger is no longer a threat, however long that takes," said CPD chairman R. James Woolsey, who served briefly as former President Bill Clinton's Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director and has often referred to the battle against radical Islam as "World War IV."
Woolsey appeared with senators Joseph Lieberman, a neoconservative Democrat who was former Vice President Al Gore's running mate in 2000, and Jon Kyl, a Republican from Arizona with strong connections to the Christian Right.
In a joint column published Tuesday in the Washington Post, the two senators argued that "too many people are insufficiently aware of our enemy's evil worldwide designs, which include waging jihad against all Americans and reestablishing a totalitarian religious empire in the Middle East."
"The past struggle against communism was, in some ways, different from the current war against Islamist terrorism," they wrote, evoking the two past CPDs. "But ... the national and international solidarity needed to prevail over both enemies is ... the same. In fact, the world war against Islamic terrorism is the test of our time."
At the press conference later, Lieberman said the purpose of the new group is "to form a bipartisan citizens' army, which is ready to fight a war of ideas against our Islamist terrorist enemies, and to send a clear signal that their strategy to deceive, demoralize and divide America will not succeed."
The two senators also claimed that the new CPD consists of "citizens of diverse political persuasions," although the vast majority of the 41 members are well-known neoconservatives who have strongly helped lead the drive to war in Iraq and have long supported broadening President George W. Bush's "war on terrorism" to include Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, as well.
Prominently represented are fellows from the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), such as former United Nations Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick, Joshua Muravchik, Laurie Mylroie, Danielle Pletka, Michael Rubin and Ben Wattenberg. Members from Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld's Defense Policy Board (DPB) include Kenneth Adelman, Newt Gingrich, and Woolsey himself.
Committee members from the Center for Security Policy (CSP), include CSP President Frank Gaffney, Charles Kupperman, William Van Cleave, and Dov Zakheim, who just stepped down as an undersecretary of defense under Rumsfeld.
Board members or fellows of several other right-wing or mainly neoconservative think tanks have also joined the new CPD, including the Heritage Foundation, the Hoover Institution, the Manhattan Institute, Freedom House, the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, the former Committee to Liberate Iraq, the National Institute for Public Policy and Americans for Victory Over Terrorism.
The majority of members are associated with policy statements by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) whose charter members in 1997 included Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick Cheney and a number of other men and women who have pushed for hawkish positions on the Middle East and China, particularly from their perches at senior levels in the Bush administration.
The original CPD was formed in 1950 with the help of anti-Communist hawks in the administration of former President Harry Truman as a "citizens' lobby" by a high-powered group of Wall Street businessmen, public-relations specialists and university administrators to raise public concern about Soviet and Chinese threats and mobilize support for a huge military budget aimed at maintaining U.S. military supremacy.
CPD-2, which was officially launched immediately after the election of President Jimmy Carter (1977-81), was created as a coalition of neoconservatives mostly hawkish Democrats who had supported the unsuccessful presidential candidacy of Senator Henry Jackson of Washington State (organized as the Coalition for a Democratic Majority, or CDM) and aggressive Republican nationalists, such as Rumsfeld, opposed to the policies of detente pursued by Henry Kissinger under former presidents Richard Nixon (1969-1974) and Gerald Ford (1974-77).
During the Carter administration, CPD-2 essentially served as a "shadow" foreign-policy cabinet -- churning out position papers and opinion columns, holding conferences, appearing on television news shows, and brokering leaks from unhappy hawks to prominent news media -- to build support for much bigger military budgets, a much more confrontational posture vis-a-vis Moscow and for "rollback" of Soviet gains in what was then called "the Third World."
When Ronald Reagan was subsequently elected president in 1980, no less than 46 CPD members advised his transition team, and most of them were absorbed into his administration, many at senior foreign-policy-making levels.
While no members of the new CPD go back to the original one 50 years ago, a significant number played important roles in CPD-2, including Adelman, Kampelman, Van Cleave, Kupperman and Kirkpatrick -- all of whom played prominent roles in the older group. Indeed, many CPD-3 members joined CPD-2 from the CDM, which was created to fight the antiwar forces that were becoming dominant in the Democratic Party in the early to mid-1970s.
Besides being hawkish toward the Soviet Union and friendly toward the Pentagon, both the CDM and the CDP-2 were also staunchly pro-Israeli at a time when the Jewish state found itself increasingly isolated on the world state.
A number of members of the new CPD, including Kampelman, Kemp, Kirkpatrick, Muravchik, Gaffney and Woolsey himself, overlap with the membership of the advisory boards of groups oriented toward Israel's governing Likud Party, such as the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), the Middle East Forum or the U.S. Committee for a Free Lebanon.
In addition, a husband-and-wife team that played a key role in the evolution of neoconservatism from the late 1960s to the present and was also associated with both CDM and CPD-2, former Commentary editor Norman Podhoretz and his spouse, Midge Decter (who co-chaired the Committee for the Free World with Rumsfeld during the Reagan administration) have also joined the new CPD.
Still, the new group does not include a number of individuals who would be politically compatible with its political views and institutional genealogy. The former DPB chairman and top Jackson aide, Richard Perle, for example, was not listed as a member, nor was his AEI colleague, Michael Ledeen.
Similarly, PNAC's leadership, including Weekly Standard Editor William Kristol, contributing editor Robert Kagan and staff director Gary Schmitt apparently opted out. Ironically, Kristol and Kagan were co-editors of an influential 2000 foreign-policy book that envisaged much of Bush's post-Sept. 11 foreign policy, called Present Dangers.
Find this article at: